Concerning MingGW, we haven't actively dropped support. So that's why there
is no "ChangeLog" entry. I no longer have it installed, though, and thus
cannot check with it anymore. (The same is true for Cygwin btw.). MinGW's
headers and libraries are getting seriously out of date and are missing many
of the "new" APIs. Mind that it is missing on support for Windows 7 which is
available since almost eight years. Anyway I am certainly happy to integrate
patches which ensure that gnuplot still compiles with MinGW. I typically
test compilation with MSVC2015, MinGW-w64 and OpenWatcom. Please understand
that these are already 10 combinations to test (3 compilers, 32/64 bit (not
Are you suggesting we rename mingw/Makefile and config.mgw to msys2/Makefile
config.msys2? We could certainly do that. The transition from MSYS/MingW to
Msys2/Mingw-w64 just felt natural to do in place. Also we made an effort to
keep support for MinGW there for quite a while. Also note that we put
together some build instructions in feature request #199. It might be a good
idea to refer to that from the homepage and the Makefile itself.
In the meantime I have tested released binary versions. They run fine on
Windows XP up to version 5.0.3. Later versions were compiled with Mingw-w64
as far as I remember and no longer run on XP. The 5.0.6 source still
compiles fine with MinGW32 and then also runs on XP, though. As you already
pointed out, version 5.2 currently does not compile with Mingw32 due to the
lack of library support.
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Allin Cottrell [mailto:[hidden email]]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 11. Juli 2017 00:48
> An: Tatsuro MATSUOKA <[hidden email]>
> Cc: gnuplot-beta <[hidden email]>; [hidden email]
> Betreff: Re: AW: Is minimal required platform Windows 7 only for the 5.3
> later for gnuplot for windows?
> On Tue, 11 Jul 2017, Tatsuro MATSUOKA wrote:
> > Thanks for the reply.
> > I understand the situation.
> > I really appreciate your successive efforts specially on gnuplot for
> > windows.
> Me too, Bastian has done a very nice job.
> But your "support for XP" question is similar to one I asked a while back
> support for mingw ("plain old" minGW as opposed to MingGW-w64). It may
> well be time to drop support for old Windows-related software, but I think
> should be made clear in the ChangeLog and among the "config" files in the
> source tree. You cannot compile current gnuplot for Windows using plain
> minGW any more, though the presence of files such as config.mgw suggests
> Allin Cottrell
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: Bastian Märkisch
> >> To: 'Tatsuro MATSUOKA' ; gnuplot-beta
> >> Cc:
> >> Date: 2017/7/10, Mon 16:08
> >> Subject: AW: Is minimal required platform Windows 7 only for the 5.3 or
> later for gnuplot for windows?
> >> For 5.2 this hasn't changed in syscfg.h. If the Direct2D windows
> >> terminal backend is included in the build, the executable will only
> >> run on Vista SP2 with platform upgrade or later, though. Moreover
> >> there could be restrictions implied by the libraries and compiler
> >> chain used, in particular Qt.
> >> Bastian
> >>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >>> Von: Tatsuro MATSUOKA [mailto:[hidden email]]
> >>> Gesendet: Sonntag, 9. Juli 2017 23:30
> >>> An: [hidden email]; [hidden email]
> >>> Betreff: Is minimal required platform Windows 7 only for the 5.3 or
> >>> later
> >> for
> >>> gnuplot for windows?
> >>> I saw the below in the ChangeLog in cvs branch source
> >>> 2017-07-07 Bastian Maerkisch <[hidden email]>
> >>> <snip>
> >>> * src/syscfg.h: Minimum required API version is Windows 7 by
> >>> default. Vista and XP are end-of-service.
> >>> For gnuplot 5.2.x, is minimal required platform windows XP?
> >>> Tatsuro
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
gnuplot-beta mailing list
Membership management via: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gnuplot-beta
|Free forum by Nabble||Edit this page|